top of page

Previous Research

My undergraduate research consisted of two independent summer research projects. Both projects were independent studies under the guidance of an advisor, and involved development of experimental protocols, data analysis, and presentation of findings.

PREDATION ON INVASIVE TUNICATES

 

Professor Sarah Cohen (Estuary & Ocean Science Center, San Francisco State University)

 

National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates

 

SFSU Deptartment of Biology Summer Research Colloquium

​

​

SUMMER 2011

​

ADVISOR:

 

FUNDING:

 

PRESENTED:

Research Question: Is there predation on invasive tunicates in the San Francisco Bay?

​

In this project, I studied whether the invasive tunicates (primarily Didemnum vexillum, as well as Botrylloides violaceus and Botryllus schlosseri) of the Bay area are subject to any significant predation from native or invasive predators. These species have proven very resistant to chemical and physical removal methods, and biocontrol has been suggested as an option, and the goal of my research was to investigate the viability of this method.

​

This involved an experimental approach as well as a survey of the California Academy of Natural Sciences’ collection of preserved tunicate samples. For the experimental component, I collected and maintained live samples of tunicates, as well as several predator species that were selected for abundance and co-occurrence with invasive tunicates. Feeding trials were run with these specimens, and any feeding behavior or potential feeding damage to prey samples was described and recorded.

​

In its native range and in a similar invasion in Alaska, D. vexillum is subject to predation from a lamellarid snail that is a tunicate specialist. No lamellarids were collected live from the wild during the course of my research, and the purpose of examining the Academy’s samples was to determine if there was any historical evidence of lamellarid predation. These snails are cryptic and can easily be preserved with specimens when collecting tunicates. Although tunicate-specialist lamellarids may not currently be present in the bay simply because they are not as tolerant of transport or conditions in the Bay and never established a population, the presence of lamellarids in historical samples could indicate that there was previously a significant population, but that it was not able to sustain itself. This could shed light on the differences between the Bay invasion and invasions in other areas where lamellarids are present, and would have implications for the possibility of using introduced lamellarids as a method of biocontrol.

​

No lamellarids were found in the preserved specimens, and observed predation in the experimental tanks was negligible. Based on my results, predation on established adult colonies, either by their invasive specialists or by native predators, is not a significant threat to invasive tunicates in the Bay. Biocontrol is not likely to be any more effective than current mechanical or chemical removal methods. Efforts to reduce the impact of invasive tunicates should focus on a multi-pronged removal approach, and better enforcement of ship ballast/hull/equipment sanitation to prevent continued re-introduction.

TREE SWALLOW OLFACTION

SUMMER 2009

​

ADVISOR:

 

FUNDING:

 

PRESENTED:

 

Professor Julie Hagelin (Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Fairbanks Alaska)

 

Norman Meinkoth Field Biology Award, Swarthmore Division of Natural Sciences & Engineering

 

Association for Chemoreception Sciences, April 2010 Conference

​

​

Research Question: Can tree swallow chicks detect and distinguish between odors?

​

This research investigated the olfactory system of the migratory passerine Tachycineta bicolor, the tree swallow. Olfactory ability has been only minimally studied in passerines because they have small olfactory bulbs, suggesting a reduced olfactory capacity. However, Dr. Hagelin’s work with crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) demonstrates that some birds use odor as part of their mating behavior. Other birds may have important olfactory-linked behaviors as well.

​

My research specifically addressed:

​

  1. if tree swallows can detect odors,

  2. if they can distinguish between odors, and

  3. if the degree to which birds distinguish between odors can be altered by exposing chicks to an experimental scent early in life.

 

The experimental odors selected were mint (a strong odor not encountered by swallows in the wild) and fox urine (a strong odor associated with a potential predator encountered in the wild). One group of experimental nest boxes was scented with mint odor after parental nest selection but before egg-laying, while the other group was left unscented. Chicks hatched from both groups were tested at multiple stages of development for their reactions to peppermint odor, fox urine odor, and an odorless control.

​

The experimental setup and data collection occurred over the course of the summer. The following spring, I processed and analyzed the data as an independent study. Chicks in both treatment groups showed significant differences in their reactions to the unscented control, mint, and fox odor, demonstrating that they have a functional olfactory system and can distinguish between different scents. Both groups reacted most strongly to fox urine scent, suggesting that they may also be adapted to recognize predator odors. Furthermore, the difference in reactions to the two scents was much greater in mint-exposed nests, with a significant reduction in reaction to mint, which suggests that tree swallows also have olfactory flexibility and can acclimate to odors.  

​

My research indicated that passerines may have a much greater olfactory capacity than had been previously assumed, and that tree swallow chicks learn about the odors in the environment in which they are raised.

bottom of page